Re: Change pfree to accept NULL argument - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Change pfree to accept NULL argument
Date
Msg-id 0c2d9164-a0ac-1a14-c837-110d05219e3a@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Change pfree to accept NULL argument  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 22.08.22 20:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not very convinced that the benefits of making pfree() more
> like free() are worth those costs.
> 
> We could ameliorate the first objection if we wanted to back-patch
> 0002, I guess.
> 
> (FWIW, no objection to your 0001.  0004 and 0005 seem okay too;
> they don't touch enough places to create much back-patching risk.)

To conclude this, I have committed those secondary patches and updated 
the utils/mmgr/README with some information from this discussion.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types