On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 10:55 PM, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > Is there no need to rewrite the Description in the Doc to state we should
> specify either -d or -f option?
> > (and also it might be better to write if -l option is given, neither
> > -d nor -f option isn't necessarily needed.)
> >
> I don't think so. The description is already there (see "pg_restore can
> operate in two modes..."). I left -l as is which means that 'pg_restore
> -l foo.dump' dumps to standard output and 'pg_restore -f - -l foo.dump'
> has the same behavior).
Ah, I understand it.
> > I think the former one looks like pretty, but which one is preffered?
> >
> I don't have a style preference but decided to change to your suggestion.
> New version attached.
I checked it. It may be a trivial matter, so thanks for taking it consideration.
--
Yoshikazu Imai
