Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I have a feeling that this was proposed a few times in the ancient past
> but did not go through because of locking issues. I can't find any
> emails about it through. Does anyone remember? Have you thought about
> locking issues?
Is this e-mail you are finding?
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20140916124537.GH25887%40awork2.anarazel.de
I am considering to add 'OR REPLACE' clause as a first step.
At least, I think there is no need to change the locking level when replacing a trigger with 'EXECUTE PROCEDURE'
clause.
In PostgreSQL, we currently have ShareRowExclusiveLock lock on relation on which trigger is created.
ShareRowExclusiveLockis enough to replace a trigger.
Also, we currently have RowExclusiveLock on pg_trigger. RowExclusiveLock is enough to replace a trigger, too.
Regards,
Okano Naoki
Fujitsu