RE: Timeout parameters - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject RE: Timeout parameters
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FBF01D3@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Timeout parameters  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Timeout parameters  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael@paquier.xyz]
> The first letter should be upper-case.

Thank you for taking care of this patch, and sorry to cause you trouble to fix that...


> to me that socket_timeout_v14.patch should be rejected as it could cause
> a connection to go down with no actual reason and that the server should
> be in charge of handling timeouts.  Is my impression right?

No, the connection goes down for a good reason that the client could not get the response within a tolerable amount of
time.


Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Next
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rewind vs superuser