Hi Peter, Imai-san,
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com]
> Your changes in LOCALLOCK still refer to PGPROC, from your first version
> of the patch.
>
> I think the reordering of struct members could be done as a separate
> preliminary patch.
>
> Some more documentation in the comment before dlist_head LocalLocks to
> explain this whole mechanism would be nice.
Fixed.
> You posted a link to some performance numbers, but I didn't see the test
> setup explained there. I'd like to get some more information on this
> impact of this. Is there an effect with 100 tables, or do you need 100000?
Imai-san, can you tell us the test setup?
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa