RE: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations areaccessed in a transaction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject RE: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations areaccessed in a transaction
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FBDFA00@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations areaccessed in a transaction  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses RE: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations areaccessed in a transaction
RE: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations areaccessed in a transaction
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Peter, Imai-san,

From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com]
> Your changes in LOCALLOCK still refer to PGPROC, from your first version
> of the patch.
> 
> I think the reordering of struct members could be done as a separate
> preliminary patch.
> 
> Some more documentation in the comment before dlist_head LocalLocks to
> explain this whole mechanism would be nice.

Fixed.


> You posted a link to some performance numbers, but I didn't see the test
> setup explained there.  I'd like to get some more information on this
> impact of this.  Is there an effect with 100 tables, or do you need 100000?

Imai-san, can you tell us the test setup?


Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VSquery mean time
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum