From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael@paquier.xyz]
> I don't think that we want to use a too generic name and it seems more natural
> to reflect the context where it is used in the parameter name.
> If we were to shrink with a similar option for other contexts, we would
> most likely use a different option. Depending on the load pattern, users
> should also be able to disable or enable a subset of contexts as well.
>
> So I agree with Julien that [auto]vacuum_shrink_enabled is more adapted
> for this stuff.
OK, I renamed it to vacuum_shrink_enabled.
From: Julien Rouhaud [mailto:rjuju123@gmail.com]
> One last thing, I think we should at least add one regression test for
> this setting. The one you provided previously seems perfectly suited.
Thanks, added.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
