RE: [bug fix] pg_rewind takes long time because it mistakenlycopies data files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject RE: [bug fix] pg_rewind takes long time because it mistakenlycopies data files
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F8D6E9E@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [bug fix] pg_rewind takes long time because it mistakenly copiesdata files  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [bug fix] pg_rewind takes long time because it mistakenly copiesdata files  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael@paquier.xyz]
> Your patch is able to fix that.  I have also checked that after diverging
> the promoted server with more data and inserting data on the old primary
> then the correct set of blocks from the tablespace is fetched as well by
> pg_rewind.  This patch also behaves correctly when creating a new relation
> on the promoted server as it copies the whole relation. In short your patch
> looks good to me.

How quick, I was surprised.  Thank you so much!  I'd be glad if you could be the reviewer in CF:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/17/1542/


> Creating a test case for this patch would be nice, however this needs a
> bit of work so as the tablespace map can be used with pg_basebackup and
> PostgresNode.pm (or use raw pg_basebackup commands in pg_rewind tests):
> - PostgresNode::init_from_backup needs to be able to understand extra
> options given by caller for pg_basebackup.
> - RewindTest::create_standby should be extended with extra arguments given
> for previous extension.
> :(

That sounds difficult from your way of saying... but this may be a good opportunity to look into the TAP tests.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug fix] Cascaded standby cannot start after a clean shutdown
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage