Re: [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect toalternative hosts when some errors occur - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect toalternative hosts when some errors occur
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F7BB500@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts whensome errors occur  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect toalternative hosts when some errors occur
List pgsql-hackers
Hello Tom, Michael,
Robert, Noah

From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Haas
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
> <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Sorry again, but how can we handle this?  A non-PG-developer, Tels (and
> possibly someone else, IIRC) claimed that the behavior be changed during
> the beta period.  Why should we do nothing?
> 
> Because we do not have consensus on changing it.  I've decided that you're
> right, but several other people are saying "no".  I can't just go change
> it in the face of objections.

How are things decided in cases like this?  Does the RMT team usually do some kind of poll?

So far, there are four proponents (Tels (non-PG-developer), David J., Robert and me), and two opponents (Tom and
Michael).

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gaddam Sai Ram
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Error: dsa_area could not attach to a segment that has been freed
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT TRIGGERs, take n, implemented with CONSTRAINT TRIGGERS