Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Subject Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Date
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F5F842A@G01JPEXMBYT05
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com]
> I have no opinion on this patch, because I haven't reviewed it, but note
> recent commit 3b90e38c5d592ea8ec8236287dd5c749fc041728, which appears to
> be semi-related.

Thank you for interesting information.  Maybe Tom-san experienced some trouble in creating this patch.  Fortunately,
thisdoesn't appear to be related to my patch, because the patch changed the timing of closing listen ports in
postmasterchildren, whereas my patch explicitly closes listen ports in postmaster.
 

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: Switch to unnamed POSIX semaphores as our preferred sema code?
Next
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: Is the last 9.1 release planned?