Hello Thomas,
30.07.2021 08:48, Thomas Munro wrote:
>>>> (Except for read-only-anomaly-3, that causes another
>>>> assertion fail but I believe that it's not related to the initial issue
>>>> and deserves another bug report.)
> The problem is that if we don't take the fast exit here:
You wouldn't mind if I file a separate bug report regarding the last
problem (not related to the initial bug report)?
Now I can propose a minimal reproduction for it, that can ease testing
and choosing the most appropriate fix.
As to v4-0001-Fix-assert-failures-in-parallel-SERIALIZABLE-READ.patch
you posted before, I believe it fixes the issues as expected and may be
committed at least to allow for advanced testing.
Best regards,
Alexander
