Re: Non-superuser subscription owners - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Date
Msg-id 07a4e680c44187539a1f4d0767270477d8145cd0.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-superuser subscription owners  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2023-03-27 at 10:46 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > There are some big issues, like the security model for replaying
> > changes.
>
> That seems largely unrelated.

They are self-evidently related in a fundamental way. The behavior of
the non-superuser-subscription patch depends on the presence of the
apply-as-table-owner patch.

I think I'd like to understand the apply-as-table-owner patch better to
understand the interaction.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: amcheck: Fix verify_heapam for tuples where xmin or xmax is 0.