My surrogate primary keys will all be INT4's. Seems like it would change something passed in
to an INT4 to match the primary key if that's what the key is.
2/3/2003 11:23:28 AM, Mikael Carneholm <carniz@spray.se> wrote:
<snip>
>Strange...using:
>200178146::bigint
>or
>'200178146'
>..the query is lightning fast. Since the PK column is of integer type, I don't think it's
logical to pass a string-type argument...or am I different than most people on this point? :)
>
>What about third party frameworks (such as Hibernate, eg) - I'm sure they will look at the
column datatype and think: 'Oh, it's an integer...I'll pass an integer argument then', which
will result in unnecessary poor performance.
>
>What's the cause of this behaviour? Why isn't psql (or the backend) converting integer type
arguments into char/string types, if there's this much to gain?
>
>(Sorry for being quite a Pg newbie..have never used Pg for such "heavy" load before)
>
>- Mikael
>
>_____________________________________________________________
>Här börjar internet!
>Skaffa gratis e-mail och gratis internet på http://www.spray.se
>
>Träffa folk från hela Sverige på ett och samma ställe - http://chat.spray.se/
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org
>
