Re: pg_type defaults - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rod Taylor
Subject Re: pg_type defaults
Date
Msg-id 05c401c1ba31$85ae48c0$8001a8c0@jester
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_type defaults  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
Responses Re: pg_type defaults  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Ahh... I see.  Didn't even consider actually trying an insert.

It breaks pretty hard with anything complex in it, like a function
call, or even a simple cast.

Copies across the statement itself rather than doing the action it
specifies.

So...  leading into domains.  Will I be required to store a binary
parse of the default value and somehow
cause it to be interpreted?

CREATE DOMAIN dom1 int4 DEFAULT 3;

The above works for me.

CREATE DOMAIN dom1 int4 DEFAULT nextval('sequence'::text);

What I store in the typdefault is similar to whats generated for
pg_attrdef.adsrc & pg_attrdef.adbin.

That is, cook the default, confirm it works, and store the output of:
   defaultValue = deparse_expression(expr,       deparse_context_for(stmt->domainname,            InvalidOid),
   false);
 

I had somehow thought it might be reparsing the default.

I guess it needs a defaultbin column to store the binary
representation.  Would it be appropriate to change the first default
directly as a nodetree and have pg_dump coax it back into the source
representation?   Is it necessary to store both representations of the
data even though it's a simple conversion to go from binary to source?

--
Rod Taylor

This message represents the official view of the voices in my head

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
To: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca>
Cc: "Hackers List" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_type defaults


>
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
>
> > According to the system table documentation
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/catalog-pg-type.html
the
> > typdefault information is to be copied from the pg_type value to
the
> > table value when the default specified is NULL or a default is not
> > specified.
> >
> > The below shows that it's not to be true.
> >
> >
> > junk=# update pg_type set typdefault = 3 where typname = 'int2';
> > UPDATE 1
> > junk=# create table example (col1 int2);
> > CREATE
> > junk=# \d example
> >         Table "example"
> >  Column |   Type   | Modifiers
> > --------+----------+-----------
> >  col1   | smallint |
>
> Seems to work for me :)
> insert into example default values;
> select * from example;
>
>  col1
> ------
>     3
>
> It doesn't show up in \d, but it is the default. I'd
> also say this makes sense/is right since the type's default
> is 3 and you don't have a default on the table.
>
>
>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [ODBC] UTF-8 data migration problem in Postgresql 7.2
Next
From: Masaru Sugawara
Date:
Subject: Re: Trouble with pg_dumpall import with 7.2