> On 18 Aug 2026, at 14:42, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
>> On 18 Aug 2026, at 14:39, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't hit be incremented only when the injection point is attached?
>
> Good point, will fix.
>
>> + checksum ^= checksum;
>>
>> That's same as "checksum = 0". That works because 0 is not a valid value but
>> was the intend to "checksum ^= 1"? to express that we want a different checksum?
>
> Ugh, sorry, I didn't notice that I hadn't replaced my debugcode before
> generating the patch, I blame the lack of caffeine this morning.
I ended up settling for setting the checksum to zero since it also makes the
checksum predictable, and with that pushed and backpatched.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
