Re: ENCODING (Unicode) - Mailing list pgadmin-support

From Dave Page
Subject Re: ENCODING (Unicode)
Date
Msg-id 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B825A1B5@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to ENCODING (Unicode)  (Reshat Sabiq <sabiq@purdue.edu>)
List pgadmin-support
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Reshat Sabiq [mailto:sabiq@purdue.edu]
Sent: 21 May 2003 08:11
To: Dave Page
Cc: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org; pgsql-novice@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] ENCODING (Unicode)
 
Thanks. Glad to hear about pgAdminIII...
To follow up on this topic:
Given that i can insert and retrieve Unicode values into either ASCII-based  
or Unicode-based DB, is Unicode-based DB less efficient? I remember reading  
something about it a while ago. I don't see immediately why that would be the  
case though, because special characters are 2 bytes either way, assuming we  
are not simplifying Unicode characters into ASCII.  
Sorry, I can't answer that - perhaps someone on pgsql-general@postgresql.org would know?
Regards, Dave. 

pgadmin-support by date:

Previous
From: Reshat Sabiq
Date:
Subject: Re: ENCODING (Unicode)
Next
From: "Lrat"
Date:
Subject: Pga2: 4 errors