Re: /contrib/retep to gborg - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: /contrib/retep to gborg
Date
Msg-id 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8128B08@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to /contrib/retep to gborg  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: /contrib/retep to gborg  (Peter Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Sent: 19 October 2002 17:17
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg
>
>
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I am concerned that removing them may cause instability,
> particularly
> > in some of the java build scripts.  That's why I am suggesting not
> > doing it during beta.
>
> Actually, it looks to me like they belong with the JDBC
> driver.  As long as JDBC is in the main distro, I think we
> should leave contrib/retep there too.
>
> There was some talk of moving JDBC to gborg, but I'm not sure
> what the plan is, if any.

Marc asked me to sort it along with some other things, but when I spoke
to Barry he didn't want to move. I passed it back to Marc.

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Freeing plan memory
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: /contrib/retep to gborg