Re: Opteron vs RHAT - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Matt Clark
Subject Re: Opteron vs RHAT
Date
Msg-id 021b01c4b144$4e822120$8300a8c0@solent
Whole thread Raw
In response to Opteron vs RHAT  (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>)
List pgsql-performance
> >>trainwreck...  If you're going through IBM, then they won't want to
> >>respond to any issues if you're not running a
> "bog-standard" RHAS/RHES
> >>release from Red Hat.
...> To be fair, we keep on actually running into things that
> _can't_ be backported, like fibrechannel drivers that were
> written to take advantage of changes in the SCSI support in 2.6.

I thought IBM had good support for SUSE?  I don't know why I thought that...


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Robin Ericsson
Date:
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [GENERAL] query problem]
Next
From: Mark Wong
Date:
Subject: futex results with dbt-3