Re: Core 2 or Opteron - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Mindaugas
Subject Re: Core 2 or Opteron
Date
Msg-id 01b701c719ef$9e73b610$f20214ac@bite.lt
Whole thread Raw
In response to Core 2 or Opteron  ("Mindaugas" <mind@bi.lt>)
Responses Re: Core 2 or Opteron
List pgsql-performance

> These benchmarks are all done using 64 bit linux:
> http://tweakers.net/reviews/646

  I see. Thanks.

  Now about 2 core vs 4 core Woodcrest. For HP DL360 I see similarly priced
dual core 5160@3GHz and four core E5320@1.86Ghz. According to article's
scaling data PostgreSQL performance should be similar (1.86GHz * 2 * 80% =
~3GHz). And quad core has slightly slower FSB (1066 vs 1333).

  So it looks like more likely dual core 5160 Woodrest is the way to go if I
want "ultimate" performance on two sockets?
  Besides that I think it should consume a bit less power!?

  Mindaugas


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Claus Guttesen"
Date:
Subject: Re: Core 2 or Opteron
Next
From: Arjen van der Meijden
Date:
Subject: Re: Core 2 or Opteron