Re: dlgFunction_patch - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Hiroshi Saito
Subject Re: dlgFunction_patch
Date
Msg-id 019401c36aa5$4d0b4c40$1f324d80@w2k
Whole thread Raw
In response to dlgFunction_patch  ("Hiroshi Saito" <saito@inetrt.skcapi.co.jp>)
List pgadmin-hackers
I am sorry.
This was because the thing that remake wasn't just done was moved.
Sigh..
Your patch is suitable.

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <saito@mail.skcapi.co.jp>

> Hi Andreas.
>
> I sometimes want it ascertained.
> The problem of the report happens with Windows of Japanese.
> I had to add that it didn't happen with FreeBSD.
> It is being found out that the solution of this problem takes time.
> Of course, it is a problem with wxWindows.
> Doesn't this problem happen in your Windows?
> If So This is the problem which is characteristic of Japanese.
>
> Regards,
> Hiroshi Saito
>
> From: "Hiroshi Saito" <saito@inetrt.skcapi.co.jp>
>
>
> > Hi Andreas.
> > Thank you for taking the time to help me in this.
> >
> > From: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>
> > > 1) you patched the wrong place, because not only comment is affected,
> > > but also GRANT. The fault is the incorrect assembled name variable.
> > 2) you're using pointers that may be zero.
> >
> > It did not seem to be the essential application part in question indeed.
> > The main part of a cause was in the previous name setup.
> >
> > // edit mode
> > name = function->GetQuotedFullIdentifier()
> >   + wxT("(") + function->GetQuotedArgTypes() + wxT(")");
> > ..
> > It seems that the function->GetQuotedArgTypes() here cannot be acquired
> well.
> >
> > It will become such if a comment is added to Dialog.
> > COMMENT ON FUNCTION public.ntest() IS 'XXXXX';
> >
> > I explore this problem.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hiroshi Saito
>


pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Where did the snapshots tarballs go ?
Next
From: "Hiroshi Saito"
Date:
Subject: Re: dlgFunction_patch