Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?
Date
Msg-id 01841001080ea2fa60443775653b5255@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?  (Timothy Madden <terminatorul@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> There is a SQL standard for this, and other DBMS look like they found a way
>
> How come it can not be done ?

It *can* be done, but it won't be done. At least not by default. You might
get better traction if you perhaps argue for a flag to pg_dump to
exhibit the behavior you want. It has a small chance of being accepted,
but a much greater chance than changing the default behavior.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200910251638
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkrkt2oACgkQvJuQZxSWSshyYwCcCRozshAfS22KtJJqoLmJdOsx
X9IAmwYedkEyw819R6P0FZXVgskefaR4
=4oy5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?
Next
From: Timothy Madden
Date:
Subject: Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?