Re: Connecting remotely. - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces
From | Adam Lang |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Connecting remotely. |
Date | |
Msg-id | 015101c04421$f323e7c0$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006 Whole thread Raw |
In response to | RE: Connecting remotely. ("Clark, Joel" <jclark@lendingtree.com>) |
List | pgsql-interfaces |
That's sort of what I was thinking... Make a reference to it and use it much like regobj.dll for modifying Registry in windows... Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company ----- Original Message ----- From: "Clark, Joel" <jclark@lendingtree.com> To: "'Adam Lang'" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com> Cc: "pgsql-interfaces" <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 10:35 AM Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Connecting remotely. > Yes, you can build libpq into libpq.dll. You can then add the function > declarations at the top, much like you would for an API call. Alternatively > you could wrap a COM object around the DLL and use it that way. > > Joel > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 9:53 AM > Cc: pgsql-interfaces > Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Connecting remotely. > > > That's what I was figuring... so... is it possible to take those files, > compile them into a dll and make a postgresql-specific remote connection > library? So, say instead of referencing ADO in Visual Basic and using the > ODBC driver, merely wrap up necessary functionality of the client side > libraries? Would that be hard? (Never made a DLL before, so unsure). > Granted it breaks the idea of writing code to use on any database, but if > you are making an in-house application and have control over the database... > Also, it wouldn't help Access oriented people, but this would be used for a > bit more hard core integration, something that if you want, you shouldn't be > using Access for a front end anyway. > > What are people's thoughts? > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marko Kreen" <marko@l-t.ee> > To: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com> > Cc: "pgsql-interfaces" <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org> > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 9:50 AM > Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Connecting remotely. > > > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 09:29:47AM -0500, Adam Lang wrote: > > > This may be a silly question, but how does *nix systems speak to a > remote > > > database without ODBC, like Windows? > > > > Database's client side libraries take care of that. But that > > means linking your app with some particular database library. > > e.g. PHP has php_pgsql, php_sybase... if you want your > > app to be database-agnostic, you can link it with e.g. UnixODBC, > > which should do the database-specific work. > > > > > As an example, PHP... I have Apache/PHP on one server, and the database > on > > > another. How does it do remote calls? > > > > $db = pg_connect("host=another.net port=5432 ... "); > > > > -- > > marko
pgsql-interfaces by date: