Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)
Date
Msg-id 01072011070501.00947@lowen.wgcr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Friday 20 July 2001 10:05, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
> > ISTM that it'd be a good thing if current versions of all the add-on
> > source files for both Debian and RedHat RPMs were part of our CVS tree

> If you want to take the job of keeping these up to date or the job of
> convincing all the 143 package developers out there to do that...

That would be my job to do for the RPM's, right? :-)  I'm already keeping
them up -- and I know how to use CVS to do it, having commit access on a
couple of other projects.

Let me just say on thing about 'our' RPMs -- they are intended as a
semi-standard base from which OS distributors may make their own packages,
for which they are responsible.  A side benefit is that people can grab the
latest hopefully-generic RPMset from us if their OS vendor isn't forthcoming
with updated packages.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: How Postgresql Compares For Query And Load Operations
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM ANALYZE