-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 21 May 2001 07:46, Arsalan Zaidi wrote:
> We tried the RPM under RH 6.2 and it would unpack, saying we needed this or
> that or the other... A whole bunch of dependencies.
> I just want to be sure... there's no compelling reason to use RH 7.x
> (basically any new distribution with newer libraries) right? Are there any
> subtle problems we'd face if we continue using this setup?
RedHat 7.1 is a substantial upgrade for more than one reason. Performance is
better, and stability (at least for me) has been just as good.
> Basically, the dependencies with the RPM install have made me suspicious...
Well, first, 7.1rc1 is old. The official 7.1 release is available, as is
7.1.1 in /pub/binary/v7.1.1/RPMS/redhat-6.2 on the ftp.postgresql.org mirror
near you.
Next, is there an existing PostgreSQL 6.5.3 install still on your 6.2 box?
If so, you'll need to issue to upgrade with all existing RPM's listed on one
rpm command line -- and you will need to add the package postgresql-libs to
the list. If that fails for some reason, please post (to the pgsql-ports
list) the resulting dependency failures.
The dependencies are there for a reason. But without details of what they
were, I cannot further advise.
- --
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7CT4l5kGGI8vV9eERArgYAKCxMQgBWTFzdDldLUjQENLwfyziLgCg5Ujz
Ap8we+lWCeoAUNfYf/o+jKg=
=lgNH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
