Re: docs: syntax.sgml patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Robert B. Easter
Subject Re: docs: syntax.sgml patch
Date
Msg-id 01012201265705.08820@comptechnews
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: docs: syntax.sgml patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: docs: syntax.sgml patch
List pgsql-patches
Woops. syntax.sgml.patch.5 is attached.  Don't use syntax.sgml.patch.4, it
has a mistake in it.  Sorry.  (Hopefully no other errors!)



On Sunday 21 January 2001 17:14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I've checked this in, or at least I used it as the starting point for what
> I did.  The GROUP BY and ORDER BY explanations seemed really complicated,
> so I disabled them for now.  They need to be made simpler, and an example
> would be nice.  Essentially, this section is now the description of the
> SELECT command; maybe it should be named like that, too.
>
> Robert B. Easter writes:
> > I worked on the ORDER BY paragraphs some more. See what you think of it
> > now. The patch is attached. :)
> >
> > On Thursday 18 January 2001 18:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > > I know this SQL Guide has been discussed, but what should be done
> > > > with this patch?
> > >
> > > I believe he's going to revise it to address Tom Lane's suggestions.

--
-------- Robert B. Easter  reaster@comptechnews.com ---------
-- CompTechNews Message Board http://www.comptechnews.com/ --
-- CompTechServ Tech Services http://www.comptechserv.com/ --
---------- http://www.comptechnews.com/~reaster/ ------------

Attachment

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Robert B. Easter"
Date:
Subject: Re: docs: syntax.sgml patch
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transactionis still open