Thanks for getting some of the table expressions into the docs. I think it
will be helpful to people. I'll see what I can do with the GROUP BY and
HAVING clauses, unless you beat me to it! Thanks again.
On Sunday 21 January 2001 17:14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I've checked this in, or at least I used it as the starting point for what
> I did. The GROUP BY and ORDER BY explanations seemed really complicated,
> so I disabled them for now. They need to be made simpler, and an example
> would be nice. Essentially, this section is now the description of the
> SELECT command; maybe it should be named like that, too.
>
> Robert B. Easter writes:
> > I worked on the ORDER BY paragraphs some more. See what you think of it
> > now. The patch is attached. :)
> >
> > On Thursday 18 January 2001 18:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > > I know this SQL Guide has been discussed, but what should be done
> > > > with this patch?
> > >
> > > I believe he's going to revise it to address Tom Lane's suggestions.
--
-------- Robert B. Easter reaster@comptechnews.com ---------
-- CompTechNews Message Board http://www.comptechnews.com/ --
-- CompTechServ Tech Services http://www.comptechserv.com/ --
---------- http://www.comptechnews.com/~reaster/ ------------
