Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jean-Michel,
>
> Please cc: this to the original poster:
He did.
> > > PostgreSQL. Today, it's clearly the superior product. It will be
>
> It is really? According to which criteria? Clearly more popular, certainly.
> However, I may point out that MS Access still has more installations than
> MySQL ...and nobody is calling MS Access a "superior database product".
Er... I said PostgreSQL was the superior product. Re-read the original post.
> To be completely blunt: MySQL the database will not easily survive the demise
> of MySQL AB.
Agreed. But $19MM ought to buy them a little more time.
Regards,
Ned
