Re: Large OR query - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Mitch Vincent
Subject Re: Large OR query
Date
Msg-id 00a301c0f34e$cc123d80$1251000a@Mitch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Large OR query  (Zak McGregor <zak@mighty.co.za>)
Responses RE: Large OR query  ("Tamsin" <tg_mail@bryncadfan.co.uk>)
Re: Large OR query  (Einar Karttunen <ekarttun@cs.Helsinki.FI>)
List pgsql-general
Is populating another table with the 1000 values and doing a
SELECT * FROM <whatever> WHERE <something> IN (SELECT <something> FROM
<whatever>) ?

I'm not entirely sure that it will yield a better result but it's worth a
try.

-Mitch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Zak McGregor" <zak@mighty.co.za>
To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 8:42 AM
Subject: [GENERAL] Large OR query


> Hi all
>
> If I have say 1000 values for an ID field, what is the best way to
> select from a table all the corresponding records?
> I have tried
> select * from blah where id in (id1,id2,id3...id1000)
> and
> select * from blah where id=id1 or id=id2 ... or id=id1000
>
> and both are pretty slow.
> Is there a better way to do this please?
>
> Thanks
>
> Ciao
> --
> Zak McGregor    http://www.carfolio.com - Over 7000 car specs online
> Web mercenary - currently for hire. Perl/html/.js/sql/cgi/GNUlinux/php +
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Trying to make bits uncopyable is like trying to make water not wet.
> The sooner people accept this, and build business models that take
> this into account, the sooner people will start making money again."
>     -- Bruce Schneier
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] PostgreSQL problem with functions
Next
From: "Mitch Vincent"
Date:
Subject: Re: How many no. of clients can access database simultaneously?