Thanks Tom,
> You're missing the point. It's the DROP that's failing, not the CREATE,
> and it's failing because the old backend is still connected to the
> victim database.
Actually, I understand that it's the DROP that's failing. What I didn't
understand is that connection closure was asynchronous, but everything else
is synchronous.
So, why can't the server-side code that closes the connection release any
resources associated with that connection before the socket is closed? It
seems that doing so could fix this problem quite cleanly.
> [template1] is not used for any "internal" operations. It is
> conventionally present so that clients have a standard place to
> connect to.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the manual - "4.1: When a new database is
created, the template database [template1] is essentially cloned. This means
that any changes you make in template1 are propagated to all subsequently
created databases."
Thanks again for your quick response,
Dietmar
