----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Burrett" <nick@dsvr.net>
To: "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki@canaan.co.il>
Cc: "postgresql" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS
> >>>But still the greatest question is what FS to put on ?
> >>>
> >>>I heard Reiesref can handle small files very quickly.
> >>
> >>Switching from ext3 to reiserfs for our name servers reduced the time
> >>taken to load 110,000 zones from 45 minutes to 5 minutes.
> >>
> >>However for a database, I don't think you can really factor this type of
> >>stuff into the equation. The performance benefits you get from
> >>different filesystem types are going to be small compared to the
> >>modifications that you can make to your database structure, queries and
> >>applications. The actual algorithms used in processing the data will be
> >>much slower than the time taken to fetch the data off disk.
> >
> >
> > So you say the FS has no real speed impact on the SB ?
> >
> > In my pg data folder i have 2367 files, some big some small.
>
> I'm saying: don't expect your DB performance to come on leaps and bounds
> just because you changed to a different filesystem format. If you've
> got speed problems then it might help to look elsewhere first.
>
I dont expect miracles :)
but still i have to choose one,so why shouldnt i choose the one which best
fit ?
