Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Date
Msg-id 009901c0f472$829e85d0$d7d310ac@jecw2k1
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> Too late ;-).  I just finished ripping out the unneeded parts and
> applying.


Thanks! I take it I still need to do the documentation though ;)


>
> I made a few minor changes too, mostly removing unnecessary code
> (you don't need to call nameout, everyone else just uses NameStr)
> and trying to line up stylistically with other code.  One actual
> bug noted: you were doing this in a couple of places:
>

Once again, thanks for the "important safety tips". I saw references to this
trap in the comments, and therefore should have known better. I guess only
practice makes perfect (hopefully!).

-- Joe



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal