Re: bytea_ops - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: bytea_ops
Date
Msg-id 008501c12393$db03d270$0705a8c0@jecw2k1
Whole thread Raw
In response to bytea_ops  ("Joe Conway" <joseph.conway@home.com>)
Responses Re: bytea_ops
Re: bytea_ops
List pgsql-patches
> which categories are present in a column.  For bytea data, there are
> no natural categories and thus no justification for extrapolating
> byte-value distribution from the info available to scalarltsel.  So
> I think there's no defensible argument for using anything but 0..255.
> (I suppose we could consider adding more info to pg_statistic for these
> types of columns, but I'm not eager to do that right at the moment.)

Changes in this rev:

- convert_byte_to_scalar uses 0..255 range always
- eliminated convert_bytea_datum, just pass and use the Datums directly

Results still look good on my random data and passes all regression tests.

-- Joe


Attachment

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: bytea_ops
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Makefile.PL for Pg.so