> where the semantics are that an entire tuple of the relation "rel" is
> passed to the function. This doesn't really gain us anything for the
> problem at hand (and we'll quite likely have to give it up anyway when
> we implement schemas, since SQL has very different ideas about what
> a.b.c means than our current parser does).
>
I wasn't quite sure if there are changes I can/should make to
has_table_privilege based on this discussion. Is there any action for me on
this (other than finishing the regression test and creating documentation
patches)?
Thanks,
-- Joe
