Re: Connection problem with 8 Beta 5 - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From George Weaver
Subject Re: Connection problem with 8 Beta 5
Date
Msg-id 005a01c4e6c6$1c51c310$6400a8c0@Dell4500
Whole thread Raw
In response to Connection problem with 8 Beta 5  (George Weaver <gweaver@shaw.ca>)
List pgsql-novice
Thanks Tom.

I'll try the odbc group.  The combo boxes are populated from functions that
perform a standard query and don't take any parameters, so the calling code
is a very simple "Select * from queryfunc()" that returns an id column and a
display column.

The odbc group could probably advise if I should change something with
respect to the connection parameters if that is the issue.

George

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "George Weaver" <gweaver@shaw.ca>
Cc: <pgsql-novice@postgresql.org>
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Connection problem with 8 Beta 5


> George Weaver <gweaver@shaw.ca> writes:
>> Faulting application test.exe, version 1.0.1813.27448, faulting module
>> psqlodbc.dll, version 8.0.0.2, fault address 0x0002001f.
>
> Certainly psqlodbc should be the first target of suspicion --- although
> it's possible this is caused by your code passing bad parameters to
> psqlodbc.  In any case the ODBC guys can help you out better than anyone
> else.
>
>> Would this be an issue arising within my application?  Is it a psqlodbc =
>> bug and should it be directed to the pgsqlodbc project as a bug?  The =
>> Microsoft event log seems to point at psqlodbc but the database log =
>> seems to point at the application.
>
> The database server can't tell the difference between psqlodbc and your
> application code --- it's all "that stuff at the other end of the TCP
> connection" to the server.
>
> regards, tom lane
>



pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Kretschmer Andreas
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres version change - pg_dump
Next
From: "Keith Worthington"
Date:
Subject: CAST and timestamp