Re: Partitioned table limitation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From paul rivers
Subject Re: Partitioned table limitation
Date
Msg-id 004c01c80451$e2b601a0$6301a8c0@parzifal
Whole thread Raw
In response to Partitioned table limitation  (Goboxe <hadzramin.ar@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Partitioned table limitation
List pgsql-general
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Goboxe
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 2:18 AM
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: [GENERAL] Partitioned table limitation
>
> Hi,
>
> Are there any limitations on number of child tables that can be use
> in
> partitioned table?
>
> [snip]

We currently use partitioning by date and id, with 1/4 a year of dates and
approximately 10 IDs (and slowly increasing).  Each partition runs from
around 1 million to 20 million rows.

Whether it's recommended or not, I don't know.  But for us, the partitioning
works exactly as advertised.  As with anything new, I'd take the time to
setup a simple test to see if it works for you, too.

In particular, be sure to check the documentation on caveats.  You'll find
these a little stricter than partitioning issues in Oracle or SQL Server.

HTH,
Paul



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: Re: more problems with count(*) on large table
Next
From: Alan Hodgson
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrading PG