Re: feeding big script to psql - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Havasvölgyi Ottó
Subject Re: feeding big script to psql
Date
Msg-id 003801c59743$fc5f8a90$8000a8c0@OTTO
Whole thread Raw
In response to Tool for database design documentation?  ("Jon Christian Ottersen" <jco@kvikkpass.no>)
Responses Re: feeding big script to psql  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
Re: feeding big script to psql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom,

Thanks for the suggestion. I have just applied both switch , -f (I have
applied this in the previous case too) and -n, but it becomes slow again. At
the beginning it reads about 300 KB a second, and when it has read 1.5 MB,
it reads only about 10 KB a second, it slows down gradually. Maybe others
should also try this scenario. Can I help anything?

Best Regards,
Otto


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <h.otto@freemail.hu>
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:54 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] feeding big script to psql


> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Havasv=F6lgyi_Ott=F3?= <h.otto@freemail.hu> writes:
>> I know it would be faster with COPY, but this is extremly slow, and the
>> bottleneck is psql.
>> What is the problem?
>
> Hmm, does the Windows port have readline support, and if so does adding
> the "-n" switch to the psql invocation fix the problem?  Or you could
> try feeding the script with -f switch or \i rather than "psql <script".
> Readline adds a fair amount of overhead, which is completely invisible
> at human typing speeds but can be annoying when reading scripts.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: stefan@net-tex.de
Date:
Subject: Re: pgmonitor
Next
From: Josef Springer
Date:
Subject: Re: unicode error on win32 Was: Re: pgmonitor