Re: H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Sander Steffann
Subject Re: H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs
Date
Msg-id 002701c2946f$934182e0$64c8a8c0@10ww.steffann.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs  ("Nikolaus Dilger" <nikolaus@dilger.cc>)
Responses Re: H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs  (SZALAI Karoly <czw@debian.hu>)
Re: H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs  (Chris Ruprecht <chris@ruprecht.org>)
List pgsql-admin
Hi,

> In a production environment I would always favor some
> kind of error protection. Either RAID 5 or RAID 1
> (mirroring).  A hardware RAID controller is faster than
> software RAID.

Considering the speed of CPU's and busses these days, software RAID can be a
lot faster than hardware RAID in many cases. I prefer hardware RAID myself
because of the simplicity (the OS doesn't need to know about the RAID
configuration), but I hear good results from people running on software
RAID.

Hope this helps you.
Sander.


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Child itemid in update-chain marked as unused - can't continue repair_frag
Next
From: Eric Hallander
Date:
Subject: ALLOW_ABSOLUTE_DBPATHS