RE: Some Improvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject RE: Some Improvement
Date
Msg-id 001801bfec9e$618d47a0$2801007e@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to AW: Some Improvement  (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>)
Responses Re: Some Improvement  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org]On
> Behalf Of Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> 
> > I still think there must be sorting going on, as the result 
> > is returned
> > instantly if you remove the ORDER BY. I don't know - I do think it's
> > much better now.
> 
> Are you doing the exact query I wrote for you ?
> That is:
>     order by mail_list desc, mail_date desc
> 
> explain should tell you if it does a sort. There should not be a 
> difference
> with 
> or without the order by.
> Hiroshi, I think you implemented the backwards index scan ?

Yes,but I didn't implement backwards index path for cost estimate.

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue@tpf.co.jp


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Questions relating to "modified while in use" messages
Next
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Date:
Subject: AW: lztext and compression ratios...