Hello
On 07.03.2017 15:58, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I've read the discussion so far but I didn't see the reason why you've
> changed it to as a contrib module. Could you tell me about that?
I did it on the initiative of our customer, who preferred the
implementation in the form of contrib. Contrib realization of WAITLSN
adds to core the only hook.
On 07.03.2017 15:58, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I guess this feature would be more useful if provided as a core
> feature and we need to discuss about syntax as Thomas mentioned.
Here I attached rebased patch waitlsn_10dev_v3 (core feature)
I will leave the choice of implementation (core/contrib) to the
discretion of the community.
Will be glad to hear your suggestion about syntax, code and patch.
--
Ivan Kartyshov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
