Re: Transaction Isolation Level - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Grace C. Unson
Subject Re: Transaction Isolation Level
Date
Msg-id 001301c41257$a3be7800$053b1cac@GREECE
Whole thread Raw
In response to Transaction Isolation Level  ("Grace C. Unson" <gracec@ntsp.nec.co.jp>)
List pgsql-general
Hello Kris,

I appreciate your immediate reply. Thanks.

I'm currently using the Driver version: PostgreSQL 7.3.1 JDBC3 jdbc driver
build 108

No, we don't invoke getTransactionIsolation() in our codes.
Is it the only way we can get this value = "TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL :
READ_COMMITTED" ?

This problem is hard to reproduce. What can you suggest I do to determine
the cause of the problem?

Thank you so much for your time.

---
Grace

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kris Jurka" <books@ejurka.com>
To: "Grace C. Unson" <gracec@ntsp.nec.co.jp>
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 6:55 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Transaction Isolation Level


>
>
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Grace C. Unson wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > How is it possible that ResultSetObjInstance in this statement
> >
> > ResultSetObjInstance = PreparedObjInstance.executeQuery()
> >
> > contains this column and value respectively:
> >
> > TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL , READ_COMMITTED ?
> >
> > ---
> > Note:
> > During the query operation, lots of write operations are going
> > simultaneously in the DB. If this is the reason of the "not-expected"
value
> > above, why is it returned and not thrown as exception?
> >
>
> This could be an indication of a thread safety problem in the driver.  Are
> you using multiple threads on the same connection?  The only code (other
> than your own) that could generate that ResultSet would be calling
> Connection.getTransactionIsolation() do you have any of these calls in
> your code?
>
> What version of the driver are you using?
>
> Kris Jurka
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: CSN
Date:
Subject: \s paging?
Next
From: Manfred Koizar
Date:
Subject: Re: self referencing tables/ nested sets etc...