Re: Index grows huge, possible leakage? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From XuYifeng
Subject Re: Index grows huge, possible leakage?
Date
Msg-id 000b01c08cc4$d3c007b0$6201a8c0@William
Whole thread Raw
In response to Index grows huge, possible leakage?  (Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
PostgreSQL hasn't a rewritten storage managent,  this is a normal case.

Regards
XuYifeng

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alfred Perlstein" <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 7:34 AM
Subject: [HACKERS] Index grows huge, possible leakage?


> After several weeks our idicies grow very large (in one case to
> 4-5 gigabytes) After droppping and recreating the indecies they
> shrink back to something more reasonable (500megs same case).
> 
> We are currently using Vadim's vacuum patches for VLAZY and MMNB, 
> against 7.0.3.  We are using a LAZY vacuum on these tables
> 
> However a normal (non-lazy) vacuum doesn't shrink the index, the
> only thing that helps reduce the size is dropping and recreating.
> 
> Is this a bug in 7.0.3?  A possible bug in Vadim's patches? Or is
> this somewhat expected behavior that we have to cope with?
> 
> As a side note, the space requirement is actually 'ok' it's just
> that performance gets terrible once the indecies reach such huge
> sizes.
> 
> -- 
> -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
> "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
> 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alfred Perlstein
Date:
Subject: Index grows huge, possible leakage?
Next
From: Peter T Mount
Date:
Subject: Format of the Money field