Serialize - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Serialize
Date
Msg-id 000901c14d9d$395d3ae0$0301a8c0@inspiron
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: driver fails to handle strings in query statements properly  ("Dave Cramer" <Dave@micro-automation.net>)
Responses Re: Serialize  (Tony Grant <tony@animaproductions.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
While fixing the handling of "unknown" data type in the result set I was
faced with wading through the Serialize code.

I am wondering if this is really a required/desireable feature?

How many people out there are actually using it?

Do we need/want it?

My thoughts are:

1) There are plenty of persistence layers which do this job much better.

2) I don't think this belongs in a driver.
3) The code will be simpler.

Dave


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp, fractional seconds problem
Next
From: Tony Grant
Date:
Subject: Re: Serialize