Re: Patch for better large objects support - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Denis Perchine
Subject Re: Patch for better large objects support
Date
Msg-id 00061316281907.00525@dyp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch for better large objects support  (Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>)
List pgsql-patches
> > > > 2. For really large objects TOAST will be really inefficient for quite small < 64K other
> > > > way around.
> > >
> > > Why will toast be inefficient for really large objects?
> >
> > Because data is stored in relations, and there's extra overhead for managing them.
> > Just look on Jan's mail in [HACKERS] for better description of the difference.
>
> According to Tom's last email, current LOs are stored in relations now.

That was a part of my patch. :-)) Anyway I will try to implement one-table LO storage
for transaction integrity. Read Jan's mail.

--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine

----------------------------------
E-Mail: dyp@perchine.com
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
----------------------------------

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Chris Bitmead
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support
Next
From: Denis Perchine
Date:
Subject: Small patch for memory leak in src/backend/catalog/pg_proc.c