Re: Allowing for longer table names (>64 characters) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bret
Subject Re: Allowing for longer table names (>64 characters)
Date
Msg-id 000001ca69ff$65f432c0$0d00a8c0@bjsworkstation
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allowing for longer table names (>64 characters)  (Allan Kamau <kamauallan@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Allan Kamau
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 1:42 AM
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Allowing for longer table names (>64
> characters)
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:21 AM, A. Kretschmer
> <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com> wrote:
> > In response to Allan Kamau :
> >> Hi all,
> >> I would like to increase the database objects names limit from 64
> >> characters to may be 128 characters to avoid name conflicts after
> >> truncation of long table/sequence names.
> >> I have seen a solution to this sometime back which
> includes (building
> >> from source) modifying a header file then recompiling, but I now
> >> cannot find this information.
> >
> > In the source-tree, src/include/pg_config_manual.h , change
> NAMEDATALEN.
> > But i think it's a bad idea ... 64 characters are enough for me.
> >
> >
> > Andreas
> > --
> > Andreas Kretschmer
> > Kontakt: �Heynitz: 035242/47150, � D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr:
> -> Header)
> > GnuPG: 0x31720C99, 1006 CCB4 A326 1D42 6431 �2EB0 389D 1DC2
> 3172 0C99
> >
> > --
> > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
> (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To
> > make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
> >
>
> Thanks Andreas, I too agree it may not be a good idea to have
> long for various reasons including porting/upgrading issues
> and so on, as I have many tables, I seem to have been caught
> up in describing table functionality in the table name :-)
>
> Allan.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
> (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




I can't imagine naming a table like you describe. A "users" table
name is pretty clear.

I would love to see an example of this. You should probably
get "un-caught-up" in using this concept. Perhaps reading about
an existing model (ie; hungarian notation) and tweak it to fit
your needs.

But hey..maybe you're on to a new thing.

Bret












pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Doug Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: PLPerl - Undefined symbol "MemoryContextSwitchTo"
Next
From: Alexandra Roy
Date:
Subject: DBD::Pg 2.15.1 compilation failed