Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

25 March 2011

• 01:12   Re: pg9.0.3 explain analyze running very slow compared to a different box with much less configuration DM
• 06:31   Why Index is not used Adarsh Sharma
• 06:44   Re: Why Index is not used Andreas Kretschmer
• 06:47   Re: Why Index is not used Adarsh Sharma
• 06:56   Re: Why Index is not used Chetan Suttraway
• 07:04   Re: Why Index is not used Adarsh Sharma
• 07:24   Re: Why Index is not used Thomas Kellerer
• 08:14   Re: Why Index is not used Chetan Suttraway
• 08:30   Re: pg9.0.3 explain analyze running very slow compared to a different box with much less configuration Marti Raudsepp
• 08:50   Re: Why Index is not used Adarsh Sharma
• 09:08   Re: Why Index is not used Chetan Suttraway
• 09:30   Re: Why Index is not used tv@fuzzy.cz
• 09:43   Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans? Vitalii Tymchyshyn
• 09:48   Re: Why Index is not used Adarsh Sharma
• 12:24   Re: Slow query on CLUTER -ed tables Laszlo Nagy
• 13:25   Re: Why Index is not used Shaun Thomas
• 14:12   Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans? Tom Lane
• 14:24   Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans? Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: pg9.0.3 explain analyze running very slow compared to a different box with much less configuration Strange, John W
• 14:41   Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans? Vitalii Tymchyshyn
• 16:49   Re: Why Index is not used Maciek Sakrejda
• 18:02   Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans? Scott Carey
• 22:43   Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans? Nathan Boley