Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

11 February 2010

• 00:42   Re: perf problem with huge table Greg Smith
• 00:46   Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline Greg Smith
• 00:52   Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline david@lang.hm
• 00:52   Re: Re: 512,600ms query becomes 7500ms... but why? Postgres 8.3 query planner quirk? Bryce Nesbitt
• 01:09   Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline Greg Smith
• 01:27   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb) Andres Freund
• 02:47   Re: How exactly PostgreSQL allocates memory for its needs? Scott Marlowe
• 02:53   Re: Re: 512,600ms query becomes 7500ms... but why? Postgres 8.3 query planner quirk? Tom Lane
• 09:05   Re: perf problem with huge table jesper@krogh.cc
• 10:29   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it! Bruce Momjian
• 11:39   Dell PERC H700/H800 Matthew Wakeling
• 12:30   Re: Re: 512,600ms query becomes 7500ms... but why? Postgres 8.3 query planner quirk? Robert Haas
• 13:39   Re: perf problem with huge table Leo Mannhart
• 15:12   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it! Scott Marlowe
• 16:28   Re: Dell PERC H700/H800 Joshua D. Drake
• 16:43   Re: Dell PERC H700/H800 Scott Marlowe
• 16:49   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it! Kevin Grittner
• 16:58   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it! Alvaro Herrera
• 17:04   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it! Aidan Van Dyk
• 17:19   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it! Kevin Grittner
• 19:11   Re: Dell PERC H700/H800 James Mansion
• 20:27   Re: Dell PERC H700/H800 Łukasz Jagiełło
• 20:55   Re: Dell PERC H700/H800 Scott Marlowe
• 23:26   Re: Dell PERC H700/H800 Joshua D. Drake