Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

27 October 2009

• 04:57   Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Craig Ringer
• 05:09   Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Jesper Krogh
• 05:34   Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Craig Ringer
• 05:45   Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Jesper Krogh
• 06:14   Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Craig Ringer
• 06:42   Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Jesper Krogh
• 14:48   Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). Robert Haas
• 15:08   Re: bitmap heap scan way cheaper than seq scan on the same amount of tuples (fts-search). jesper@krogh.cc