Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

27 March 2006

• 06:03   Re: Array performance Ruben Rubio Rey
• 11:14   Re: [GENERAL] experiences needed - how does Itanium2/1.5GHz(4MB) compare to AMD and Intel CPUs as far as Postgresql is concerned Jim C. Nasby
• 12:34   count(*) performance Gábriel Ákos
• 12:41   Re: count(*) performance Jim C. Nasby
• 13:25   Query parallelism luchot
• 13:31   Re: Query parallelism Jim C. Nasby
• 15:32   Re: count(*) performance Luke Lonergan
• 17:04   Re: count(*) performance Gábriel Ákos
• 17:05   Re: count(*) performance Gábriel Ákos
• 17:15   Re: count(*) performance Luke Lonergan
• 17:21   Re: count(*) performance Gábriel Ákos
• 17:47   simple join uses indexes, very slow george young
• 18:21   Re: count(*) performance Brendan Duddridge
• 18:21   Re: count(*) performance Matthew T. O'Connor
• 18:35   Re: count(*) performance Alvaro Herrera
• 18:43   Re: count(*) performance Guido Neitzer
• 19:16   Large Binary Objects Middleware Rodrigo Madera
• 20:57   Re: count(*) performance Mikael Carneholm
• 21:42   Re: count(*) performance Matthew T. O'Connor
• 22:13   Re: count(*) performance Tom Lane
• 22:17   Re: count(*) performance Mikael Carneholm