Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

22 March 2006

• 00:08   Re: Poor performance o Craig A. James
• 01:22   Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Vivek Khera
• 01:48   motherboard recommendations Jeff Frost
• 03:31   Re: Poor performance o Tom Lane
• 07:04   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, Guillaume Cottenceau
• 08:04   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performanceoptimization Mikael Carneholm
• 08:18   Re: Query Feromance Marco Furetto
• 08:48   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write Simon Riggs
• 10:50   Re: Sequence Scan vs. Index scan Alejandro D. Burne
• 11:12   Re: Sequence Scan vs. Index scan Steinar H. Gunderson
• 11:24   Re: Sequence Scan vs. Index scan Alejandro D. Burne
• 11:25   Re: Poor performance o Jim C. Nasby
• 11:47   Re: WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command Jim C. Nasby
• 11:55   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performanceoptimization Jim C. Nasby
• 12:08   Re: WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command Simon Riggs
• 12:12   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performanceoptimization Mikael Carneholm
• 12:19   Re: WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command Jim C. Nasby
• 13:06   Intel C/C++ Compiler Tests Spiegelberg, Greg
• 13:34   Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performanceoptimization Tom Lane
• 14:06   Re: WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command Tom Lane
• 14:14   Re: WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command Jim C. Nasby
• 14:35   Re: WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command Tom Lane
• 14:50   Massive Inserts Strategies ashah
• 15:07   Re: Massive Inserts Strategies PFC
• 15:09   Re: Massive Inserts Strategies Jim C. Nasby
• 15:16   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, Scott Marlowe
• 15:20   Re: WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command Csaba Nagy
• 15:26   Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost, Guillaume Cottenceau
• 16:11   Re: Intel C/C++ Compiler Tests Luke Lonergan
• 18:37   Re: WAL logging of SELECT ... INTO command Kris Jurka