Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

30 August 2004

• 02:10   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Mr Pink
• 02:23   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Tom Lane
• 07:38   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Mr Pink
• 08:20   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Guy Thornley
• 15:41   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Greg Stark
• 16:02   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Steinar H. Gunderson
• 16:47   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Tom Lane
• 17:46   seqscan instead of index scan Martin Sarsale
• 17:53   Re: seqscan instead of index scan Bruno Wolff III
• 18:06   Re: seqscan instead of index scan Merlin Moncure
• 18:07   Re: seqscan instead of index scan Martin Sarsale
• 18:17   Re: seqscan instead of index scan Martin Sarsale
• 18:29   Re: seqscan instead of index scan Merlin Moncure
• 19:09   Re: seqscan instead of index scan Bruno Wolff III
• 19:15   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
• 19:19   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
• 19:30   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
• 19:32   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Bruno Wolff III
• 19:37   Re: seqscan instead of index scan Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
• 20:04   Re: seqscan instead of index scan Stephan Szabo
• 20:18   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Greg Stark
• 20:36   Re: seqscan instead of index scan Greg Stark
• 20:48   Re: seqscan instead of index scan Tom Lane
• 21:00   Re: Why does a simple query not use an obvious index? Tom Lane