Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

18 September 2018

• 00:09   Re: Online verification of checksums Stephen Frost
• 00:27   Re: Stored procedures and out parameters Pavel Stehule
• 01:32   Re: Collation versioning Greg Stark
• 01:46   Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables Pavel Stehule
• 01:56   Re: Collation versioning Douglas Doole
• 02:49   Re: Collation versioning Thomas Munro
• 03:14   Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions(PostgreSQL 11) Thomas Munro
• 03:29   Re: Strange OSX make check-world failure Thomas Munro
• 03:33   Re: Online verification of checksums Tomas Vondra
• 03:39   Re: Strange OSX make check-world failure Tom Lane
• 03:50   Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on Tom Lane
• 04:01   Re: Online verification of checksums Stephen Frost
• 05:35   Re: infinite loop in parallel hash joins / DSA / get_best_segment Thomas Munro
• 05:38   Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontend code for Wi Tom Lane
• 06:11   Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontend codefor Wi Michael Paquier
• 06:34   Re: Online verification of checksums Tomas Vondra
• 06:45   Re: Online verification of checksums Stephen Frost
• 07:18   Re: [PATCH] Fix for infinite signal loop in parallel scan Thomas Munro
• 08:20   Re: Changing the setting of wal_sender_timeout per standby Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 08:38   Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 08:42   Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontend codefor Wi Michael Paquier
• 08:47   Re: Changing the setting of wal_sender_timeout per standby Michael Paquier
• 10:01   Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions(PostgreSQL 11) Pavel Stehule
• 10:06   Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 10:33   Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on Amit Khandekar
• 10:52   Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on Amit Khandekar
• 11:31   Re: Getting ERROR: could not open file "base/13164/t3_16388" withpartition table with ON COMMIT Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
• 11:43   Difference in TO_TIMESTAMP results. Prabhat Sahu
• 11:49   Re: Multiple primary key on partition table? amul sul
• 11:51   Re: Cache lookup errors with functions manipulation object addresses Michael Paquier
• 12:34   Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP Michael Paquier
• 12:39   Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP Michael Paquier
• 13:15   Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 13:51   Re: Difference in TO_TIMESTAMP results. Alexander Korotkov
• 14:02   Re: [HACKERS] Removing LEFT JOINs in more cases Antonin Houska
• 14:27   RE: Changing the setting of wal_sender_timeout per standby Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 14:32   Re: Difference in TO_TIMESTAMP results. Andrew Gierth
• 15:25   Re: [PATCH] Fix for infinite signal loop in parallel scan Oleksii Kliukin
• 16:11   Re: Online verification of checksums Michael Banck
• 16:27   Code of Conduct Dave Page
• 16:27   Code of Conduct Dave Page
• 16:37   Re: Online verification of checksums Michael Banck
• 16:55   Is it possible for postgres_fdw to push down queries on co-located tables? Jinhua Luo
• 17:05   What is OLD in INSTEAD OF trigger? Jinhua Luo
• 17:07   Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). Prabhat Sahu
• 17:33   EXPLAIN stored procedures Jinhua Luo
• 17:35   Re: Changing the setting of wal_sender_timeout per standby Masahiko Sawada
• 17:54   Re: [PATCH] Fix for infinite signal loop in parallel scan Thomas Munro
• 18:02   Re: EXPLAIN stored procedures Andrew Gierth
• 18:05   Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options Krasiyan Andreev
• 18:14   Re: Problem while updating a foreign table pointing to apartitioned table on foreign server Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 18:34   Re: Unused argument from execute_sql_string() Yugo Nagata
• 18:48   Re: Collation versioning Stephen Frost
• 19:42   Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). Alexander Korotkov
• 19:43   Re: Is it possible for postgres_fdw to push down queries on co-located tables? Tom Lane
• 20:20   Re: Is it possible for postgres_fdw to push down queries onco-located tables? Jinhua Luo
• 20:37   Re: Online verification of checksums Michael Banck
• 20:45   Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontend code for Wi Tom Lane
• 20:58   Is it really difficult for postgres_fdw to implement READ COMMITTED isolation? Jinhua Luo
• 21:28   Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontendcode for Wi Laurenz Albe
• 21:33   Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions (PostgreSQL 11) Tom Lane
• 21:38   Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontend code for Wi Tom Lane
• 21:45   Re: Online verification of checksums Stephen Frost
• 21:53   Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums Michael Banck
• 22:04   Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontendcode for Wi Laurenz Albe
• 22:09   Re: Is it really difficult for postgres_fdw to implement READCOMMITTED isolation? Ashutosh Bapat
• 22:10   Re: Is it possible for postgres_fdw to push down queries onco-located tables? Dilip Kumar
• 22:15   Re: PostgreSQL 11 {Beta 4, RC1} Release: 2018-09-20 Jonathan S. Katz
• 23:15   Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function Hironobu SUZUKI
• 23:52   Re: Online verification of checksums David Steele